LandCAN

Oil, Gas, and Mineral Right Exchanges

By:

Investors who desire tax deferral on the sale or exchange of oil and gas interests may have the opportunity to reap the advantages of an exchange. 

 

As in any exchange, it is important to consult with tax and legal advisors regarding applicable state laws and the specifics of each transaction whenever oil, gas or mineral interests are involved. Investors will want to analyze exactly the nature of the oil or gas interest to evaluate whether or not it might qualify for tax deferred treatment under IRC §1031.

Oil and gas interests:
A royalty is generally considered “like-kind” real property and can be exchanged for any other real property. [Anderson V. Helvering, (1940); Rev. Rul. 72-117 (1972)]. However, a production payment is usually considered personal property because it is treated as an assignment of income and, therefore, is not like-kind to a real property interest. [Comm. V. P.G. Lake, Inc. (1958)]. 

The primary distinction between these a royalty and a production payment is the duration of the respective interest. An overriding royalty interest continues until the oil or gas deposit is exhausted. On the other hand, a production payment usually terminates when a specified quantity of oil or gas has been produced or a stated amount of proceeds have been received.

Mineral interests: 
Minerals transferred with a fee interest can also be considered part of the real estate and not a separate asset or inventory to the property owner. [Butler Consol. Coal Co. v. Comm. (1946)]. Generally a working interest or royalty interest can be exchanged for another working or royalty interest or other real property. However, the IRS may disallow an exchange if the investor sells a working interest and retains royalty interests or surface rights.

The following exchanges did qualify for tax deferral:
• Overriding royalty interest in oil, gas and mineral rights for an undivided one-half of the fee in a parcel of improved real property. [Crichton, Kate (1940)]
• An interest in a producing oil lease extending until the exhaustion of the deposit for a fee interest in an improved ranch. [Rev. Rul. 68-331 (1968)]
• Perpetual water rights for a fee interest in land, when local law treats water rights as real property rights and the water right is in perpetuity as compared to a specific amount of water. [Rev. Rul. 55-749 (1955)]

The following did not qualify for tax deferral:
• Limited oil payment right for an overriding oil and gas royalty where the oil payment was a limited interest and the overriding royalty was to continue as long as gas or oil might be produced. [Midfield Oil. Co. (1939)]
• Leasehold measured in terms of a fixed percentage of all oil that might be produced from leasehold measured in terms of a fixed number of barrels of oil. [Bandini Petroleum Co. (1951)]. Carved out oil payment rights for a fee interest in a ranch, even though local law treated them all as interests in real property. [Fleming, William (1955)].
Reminder:
The views and opinions expressed in this reposted content do not necessarily reflect those of LandCAN. This material is shared for informational purposes only and does not constitute an endorsement of the practices or viewpoints presented.